Guide
Why nitrogen dilution does not make compressed acetylene safe and what nitrogen is really for
Nitrogen dilution does not make compressed acetylene safe. Strizhevskii and Zaitseva (1959) found a nitrogen mixture at 2.7 atm absolute still decomposed with 68 % acetylene, and nitrogen is about half as effective as propane. If a diluted mixture detonates, the final pressure is higher than without nitrogen. Nitrogen is for purging.
- Nitrogen needed at low pressure
- At 2.0 atm absolute total a mixture with 77 % acetylene
- Nitrogen against propane
- In the 5
- Nitrogen needed to stop a detonation in pipe
- About 30 % nitrogen to quench detonation and 46
- Ranking of diluents
- Ammonia slightly better than carbon dioxide; carbon dioxide significantly better than nitrogen
- Indian purge rule
- Purge with nitrogen of at least 97.5 % purity; line free of air when exit gas holds no more than 2.5 % oxygen
Adding nitrogen to acetylene raises the pressure at which a decomposition can travel through it, but it cannot suppress the hazard, and it is a weak diluent compared with most alternatives. Worse, if a nitrogen-diluted mixture does detonate, the final pressure is higher than it would have been with no nitrogen at all. Nitrogen has an essential role in an acetylene plant, but that role is purging, not making compressed acetylene safe.
What the dilution data show
The most complete set of measurements is by Strizhevskii and Zaitseva (Tr. Vses. Nauchn.-Issled. Inst. Avtogen. Obrabotki Metallov, 1959). They measured the minimum decomposition pressure of acetylene mixed with seven different gases. The table gives the percentage of acetylene in the mixture at the decomposition limit for four of them; a mixture with more acetylene than this, at that total pressure, can decompose.
| Total pressure (atm absolute) | Nitrogen mixture | Carbon dioxide mixture | Propane mixture | Natural gas mixture |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 | 77 % acetylene (1.5 atm partial) | 85 % (1.7 atm) | 90 % (1.8 atm) | 93 % (1.9 atm) |
| 2.7 | 68 % (1.8 atm) | 80 % (2.1 atm) | 87 % (2.3 atm) | 89 % (2.4 atm) |
| 4.4 | 53 % (2.3 atm) | 67 % (2.9 atm) | 80 % (3.3 atm) | 69 % (3.0 atm) |
The 4.4 atm row is shown for the trend; its individual digits are still to be checked against the original table.
Read across each row and the pattern is clear. At 2.7 atm absolute a mixture that is almost one-third nitrogen is still at its decomposition limit, and the nitrogen needed keeps rising with pressure. Helium and hydrogen behaved much like nitrogen in the same work; butane, propane and natural gas allowed far higher acetylene percentages for the same total pressure.
Summarising these results for the 5–20 atm range, the compilation by S. A. Miller (1965) gives a working rule: nitrogen needed to stabilise an acetylene mixture is about twice the propane content, and natural gas about one and a half times the propane content, by volume. Even heavy dilution does not allow acetylene to be operated safely at high partial pressure, and detonation is believed to remain possible at appreciable dilution if the length-to-diameter ratio of the pipe is high enough.
Why can nitrogen make the result worse?
The pressure reached in a detonation is a multiple of the total initial pressure. In the Chapman–Jouguet plane it is about 20–24 times the initial pressure, and two to two and a half times that again where the wave reflects off a closed end (dead legs and predetonation distance).
Suppose a process needs acetylene at a partial pressure of 2 atm absolute and nitrogen is added to bring the total to 4 atm absolute, in the hope of stabilising it. If the mixture still detonates, the multiplier applies to 4 atm, not 2. The same acetylene now produces a final pressure roughly twice as high. The compilation by S. A. Miller (1965) states this consequence directly: with nitrogen as diluent, a detonation from a given acetylene partial pressure ends at a higher final pressure than if no nitrogen were present.
So dilution that falls short is worse than no dilution. A designer who adds nitrogen and then raises the total pressure to recover the acetylene partial pressure has made the plant more dangerous, not less.
Rules that matter
The pipeline experiments of Webster et al. (IChemE Symposium Series No. 33, 1972) give the figures for a long tube. In a 38 mm by 31 m tube:
How much nitrogen does it take in a pipe?
- nitrogen needed to quench detonation rose from nothing at 250 kN/m² to about 30 % at 600 kN/m² absolute;
- stopping deflagration at 600 kN/m² took 46–51 % nitrogen;
- ammonia at 600 kN/m² needed about 20 % for detonation and 30 % for deflagration;
- carbon dioxide performed slightly worse than ammonia but significantly better than nitrogen.
The authors suggest that chemical interaction with the diluent matters more than physical properties, which explains why nitrogen, the most inert of the group, is also the least effective.
At low pressure the picture looks kinder, and that is where the confusion starts. For hot-wire flames in acetylene at 300 °C and about 2 atm, the compilation by S. A. Miller (1965) records that 14 % nitrogen extinguished the flame, against 11 % propane. Figures like these are sometimes quoted as if they applied at compressor or cylinder pressures. They do not. The nitrogen requirement rises steeply with pressure, as both the 1959 and 1972 data show.
Two exceptions: ammonia and carbon monoxide
Two diluents behave quite differently, as compiled by S. A. Miller (1965).
- Ammonia gave acetylene partial-pressure limits of 4.3 atm absolute at 50 % acetylene, 7.2 atm at 45 % and 10.0 atm at 20 %.
- Carbon monoxide gave what the compilation calls striking stabilisation. Wet mixtures with about 20 % acetylene at 19 °C resisted platinum-wire initiation at acetylene partial pressures up to 42 atm, which is the vapour pressure of acetylene at that temperature.
Neither is a practical stabiliser for an industrial gas plant: ammonia is toxic and an acetylide promoter with copper, and carbon monoxide is toxic. They matter here because they show that stabilisation is chemical, and that nitrogen's inertness is exactly why it does so little.
Rules that matter
Nitrogen is used in every acetylene plant, and correctly so. Its jobs are displacement and exclusion of air.
What nitrogen is actually for
- Purging before admitting acetylene IS 15190 (Part 1):2002 clause 12.6 specifies nitrogen of at least 97.5 % purity at 15–20 m/s, treats a line as free of air when the outgoing gas contains no more than 2.5 % oxygen, holds purged sections at about 100 kPa gauge, and closes vents once acetylene reaches 10 % in the nitrogen.
- Purging before opening up The KIGL plant operation manual purges the generator with nitrogen through the high-level check valve for 5 minutes where available, and purifiers for 2–3 minutes before admitting acetylene. Equipment is made safe for maintenance by purging, then by gas testing, as described under start-up, shutdown and purging.
- Preventing vacuum Air ingress is the root of most acetylene incidents. The Italian rules compiled by S. A. Miller (1965) required the system to be able to restore pressure rapidly with nitrogen, so that a falling line pressure never draws in air.
EIGA Doc 237 requires nitrogen for purging generators and prohibits carbon dioxide, because discharging carbon dioxide can generate static electricity. That is a useful lesson in reading rules with their reasons: carbon dioxide is the better inertant, but the worse purge gas. The static hazard is covered on the minimum ignition energy page.
Nitrogen in a dissolved acetylene cylinder is a contaminant
Nitrogen left in the system after purging travels to the cylinders. It is not absorbed by the acetone the way acetylene is, so it occupies gas space and raises pressure. EIGA Doc 240/22 notes that settled cylinder pressure rises by about 0.4 bar for every 0.1 % by volume of air or nitrogen. The C.P.I. (Safety in the Production and Use of Acetylene, Paris 1968) records that nitrogen in the gas phase also reduces acetylene's solubility in acetone. Purges must therefore be completed and displaced with acetylene before filling, not left in the lines. The pressure does not show contents page explains how an abnormal settled pressure is read.
Nitrogen is also an asphyxiant. Purge vents should discharge at height, and anyone entering a vessel that has been purged needs the oxygen check described on the nitrogen asphyxiation page.
Rules that matter
Rules to apply
- Do not use nitrogen dilution as the basis of safety for compressed acetylene. Control total pressure, bore, temperature and ignition sources, and fit arrestors.
- Never add nitrogen and then raise the total pressure to recover the acetylene partial pressure. If the mixture detonates, the final pressure is higher.
- Use nitrogen of at least 97.5 % purity for purging and check the exit oxygen content against IS 15190 (Part 1) clause 12.6.3, at 2.5 % or below.
- Use nitrogen, not carbon dioxide, for purging generators and lines, following EIGA Doc 237.
- Displace purge nitrogen completely before filling cylinders, and investigate any cylinder whose settled pressure is higher than its temperature and contents justify.
- Supply purge nitrogen from a source of known purity. KIGL supplies nitrogen gas in cylinders for this duty.
Why nitrogen dilution does not make compressed acetylene safe — frequently asked questions
Does adding nitrogen to acetylene prevent decomposition?
It raises the pressure needed but does not prevent it. In the Strizhevskii and Zaitseva measurements of 1959 a nitrogen mixture at 2.7 atm absolute was still at its decomposition limit with 68 % acetylene, and the nitrogen needed grows with pressure. Heavy dilution narrows the hazard; it never removes it, and detonation remains possible in long pipes even at appreciable dilution.
Why can nitrogen make an acetylene detonation worse?
Detonation pressure scales on the total initial pressure, not just the acetylene partial pressure. If nitrogen is added to keep the same acetylene partial pressure, the total pressure rises, and if the mixture still detonates the final pressure is higher than it would have been without nitrogen. Dilution that fails is worse than no dilution.
Which gas is the best diluent for acetylene?
Among common gases, ammonia and carbon monoxide are exceptional, carbon dioxide is better than nitrogen, and hydrocarbons such as propane are better still at moderate pressures. Webster et al. (1972) ranked ammonia slightly ahead of carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide well ahead of nitrogen. None of these is a substitute for pressure limits and arrestors.
Why is nitrogen used for purging acetylene plant if it is a weak diluent?
Because purging is about displacing air and acetylene, not stabilising compressed acetylene. Nitrogen is inert, cheap, dry and does not generate the static charge that discharging carbon dioxide can. EIGA Doc 237 requires nitrogen for purging generators and prohibits carbon dioxide for that reason, despite carbon dioxide being the better inertant.
How much nitrogen is allowed in dissolved acetylene?
Nitrogen is a contaminant in a DA cylinder. It is not absorbed by the acetone and raises the settled pressure: EIGA Doc 240/22 notes about 0.4 bar rise for every 0.1 % by volume of air or nitrogen. It also reduces acetylene solubility in acetone, so purge nitrogen must be displaced fully before filling begins.
What nitrogen purity is required for purging acetylene pipelines in India?
IS 15190 (Part 1):2002 clause 12.6 asks for nitrogen of at least 97.5 % purity at 15–20 m/s, treats the line as free of air when outgoing nitrogen contains no more than 2.5 % oxygen, keeps purged sections at about 100 kPa gauge, and closes vents once acetylene reaches 10 % in the nitrogen during admission.
References
- Bureau of Indian Standards. (2002). Acetylene Pipelines — Code of Practice up to 155 kPa(g) (IS 15190 (Part 1):2002).
- European Industrial Gases Association. (2022). Code of Practice: Acetylene (EIGA Doc 123/22). https://www.eiga.eu/uploads/documents/DOC123.pdf
- European Industrial Gases Association. (n.d.). Acetylene generators and EIGA Doc 240/22 Commodity specification: acetylene — (EIGA Doc 237).
- Webster et al., The Explosive Decomposition of Acetylene in Pipelines, IChemE Symposium Series No. 33 (1972) https://www.icheme.org/media/10611/iv-paper-08.pdf
Enquiries
Request a quotation
State the gas or equipment, the quantity or capacity, and your location. KIGL will confirm the grade, the cylinder or plant size, and whether the location can be served from Noonmati, or through the agent network.